The tragic story of Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie captivated the world, not only because of its heartbreaking outcome but also because it exposed the warning signs of an abusive relationship that were missed along the way. In documentaries, including the recent Netflix documentary, Brian’s behavior repeatedly showed hallmarks of control, manipulation, and emotional abuse—red flags that many survivors and experts immediately recognized.
Brian’s Abuse of Gabby
From the bodycam footage in Moab, Utah, to witness statements and his final confession, Brian exhibited classic patterns of coercive control, gaslighting, and psychological abuse. Below is a breakdown of the key behaviors that reveal how his abuse escalated.
Manipulation & Gaslighting
One of the most chilling aspects of Laundrie’s behavior was his ability to twist reality and make Gabby question herself.
Examples from the Documentary:
In the Moab police bodycam footage, Gabby is seen apologizing repeatedly and blaming herself for their argument—despite witnesses reporting that Brian was the one hitting her.
Brian downplayed the situation, telling officers that Gabby just "gets worked up sometimes" and that she was the “aggressor,” making her seem like the irrational one because she appeared distressed and admitted to being overwhelmed.
Laundrie often tried to control the narrative about how Gabby was perceived, attempting to downplay her emotions or exaggerating her supposed "anger" and instability. He manipulated the narrative to make it seem as if her emotional reactions were out of line, while his own aggressive behavior was overlooked.
Gabby said Brian didn’t believe in her blog and would criticize her efforts, a common tactic abusers use to undermine confidence and make their partner dependent on them.
Brian was seen rolling his eyes in one of Gabby’s videos after she mentioned wanting to keep the van clean, sending the message that her needs are unimportant and “overly dramatic.” This is the same topic that Gabby reported led to their argument just prior to the 911 call.
Laundrie created confusion about the relationship, with Gabby expressing feelings of being conflicted about the relationship. Laundrie often shifted between being loving and emotionally distant, creating confusion and doubt in her mind. He would occasionally offer moments of affection, making her feel emotionally dependent and more likely to stay in the relationship despite the abuse.
Why This Is Abusive:
Gaslighting is when an abuser manipulates someone into doubting their reality, making them easier to control.
Brian’s calm and collected demeanor in contrast to Gabby’s distress is a common dynamic in abusive relationships—the abuser appears rational while the victim seems “hysterical” due to constant emotional turmoil.
Isolation & Control Over Gabby
Abusers often seek to isolate their victims, cutting them off from friends, family, and independence.
Examples from the Documentary:
Laundrie discouraged Gabby from maintaining strong communication with her family and friends, creating a sense of emotional isolation. Gabby’s best friend Rose Davis revealed that Brian didn’t like her hanging out with friends and was jealous of her relationships with others. There were instances where she seemed less in touch with loved ones during their road trip, which may have been part of his attempt to cut off her support system. Brian hid Gabby’s driver’s license to stop her from going out with Rose prior to Gabby and Brian leaving for their van trip.
He often played on Gabby’s emotions, manipulating her into thinking she was the problem in the relationship. This led to emotional confusion, making her doubt her perceptions and feelings, which is a common tactic in abusive relationships to maintain control.
Throughout their trip, Laundrie often appeared to closely monitor Gabby’s actions, decisions, and even how she interacted with others. This sense of surveillance can be a form of control, creating fear and anxiety in the victim, and discouraging them from reaching out to others.
Witnesses at a Wyoming restaurant saw Brian aggressively arguing with staff, while Gabby looked visibly upset—showing that she was likely walking on eggshells around his temper.
Why This Is Abusive:
Isolation is a key tactic abusers use to make their victims feel dependent on them.
Keeping Gabby financially restricted and away from friends meant that she had fewer escape options.
Public Charm vs. Private Aggression
Many abusive individuals know how to mask their true behavior in public while displaying a completely different personality behind closed doors.
Examples from the Documentary:
Brian laughed and joked with police officers during the Moab stop, acting like the calm and rational one, maintaining a likeable demeanor, while Gabby was in visible distress. This public behavior helped him avoid suspicion and made it harder for others to see the abuse.
He charmed strangers and seemed friendly—yet witnesses saw him lash out at Gabby when no one was watching.
On social media and during their interactions with others, Laundrie would often appear affectionate and supportive of Gabby, portraying an image of a happy, loving couple.
In private, Laundrie’s aggression also escalated to physical intimidation, as seen in the moments where he would take control of situations, exert dominance, and slam the van door (as seen in the videos from the supermarket security cam), leading to tension in their relationship and fear in Gabby.
In his final confession letter, Brian painted himself as the victim, showing zero accountability for what really happened.
Why This Is Abusive:
Abusers often appear likable and normal to outsiders, making it harder for victims to be believed. This façade concealed the controlling and abusive behavior he exhibited in private, further isolating Gabby by making her situation appear normal or even enviable to outsiders.
This dual personality—charming in public, cruel in private—is a form of manipulation that keeps victims trapped.
While the abuse wasn’t always overtly physical, it was emotionally threatening and controlling.
Verbal & Emotional Abuse
Emotional abuse can be just as damaging as physical violence, and Brian showed numerous signs of demeaning, invalidating, and undermining Gabby’s self-worth.
Examples from the Documentary:
Gaslighting & Blame-Shifting
In the Moab police bodycam footage, Brian downplayed his role in their conflict and shifted the blame onto Gabby, making her seem irrational and overly emotional.
He painted himself as calm and rational while subtly discrediting Gabby’s feelings, making her doubt her own perception of reality.
Controlling & Demeaning Behavior
Witnesses reported seeing Brian taking Gabby’s phone and controlling her movements, indicating coercive control—a form of emotional abuse where the abuser limits the victim’s independence.
Gabby’s friends reported that Brian would put down her work and ideas, making her feel like she wasn’t good enough.
Witnesses saw Brian mocking and belittling Gabby in public.
Gabby was constantly anxious around Brian, a common response in emotionally abusive relationships where the victim is always trying to please the abuser to avoid conflict.
Intimidation & Emotional Manipulation
A witness saw Brian aggressively arguing with Gabby and locking her out of their van, a clear sign of intimidation and control, leaving her in distress and publicly humiliating her.
He allegedly grabbed Gabby’s face forcefully in an argument, which, while not necessarily physically violent in the moment, was an act of physical intimidation used to establish dominance.
Cycle of Affection & Fear (Trauma Bonding)
Like many abusers, Brian alternated between being affectionate and then cold or cruel. This inconsistency creates trauma bonding, making the victim more emotionally dependent and hopeful for the “good” moments.
Why This Is Abusive:
Emotional abuse breaks a victim’s self-confidence, making them feel they can’t survive without the abuser.
Over time, victims internalize the negative messages, believing they are truly at fault.
Escalation of Violence
Domestic violence often starts with control and emotional abuse before escalating into physical harm.
Examples from the Documentary:
The Moab 911 caller reported seeing Brian hitting Gabby, showing that physical violence had already begun before it escalated further, yet the police misidentified Gabby as the aggressor. This violence was shown in Gabby’s selfie on her phone.
Brian locked Gabby out of their van after a fight, a power move designed to intimidate her.
The documentary highlighted how Gabby took the blame for the conflict, while Brian appeared calm and composed, a classic sign of manipulation and gaslighting. It also showed that officers focused on Gabby’s emotional distress rather than Brian’s controlling behavior, missing the early signs of abuse.
Clips and interviews revealed how Gabby constantly minimized Brian’s actions and blamed herself, a common reaction in emotionally abusive relationships that escalate to physical danger.
The documentary emphasized how Brian took control of their van-life journey, leaving Gabby isolated from friends, family, and resources, a tactic that often precedes more severe abuse.
Gabby stating to the police that Brian grabbed her face and jaw is a serious red flag indicating escalating violence and a possible history of past attempts at strangulation, which is one of the most dangerous warning signs of lethal domestic violence.
Why This Is Abusive:
Many homicides in abusive relationships are preceded by escalating violence.
The signs were there, but they were dismissed or downplayed.
Grabbing a victim’s face or jaw is a highly controlling act, meant to physically dominate them, silence them, and instill fear. It is also a common precursor to strangulation, as it demonstrates a willingness to exert force near the neck and restrict the victim’s movement.
Research shows that a prior attempt to strangle a victim increases the risk of homicide by 750%, making this behavior a critical danger sign that the violence may have already been life-threatening or was escalating toward fatal violence. The intimate nature of face-grabbing suggests an intent to assert control over speech, breath, and autonomy, all of which are key elements in coercive control and escalating abuse.
Lack of Remorse & Blame-Shifting
Even after Gabby’s murder, Brian refused to take responsibility.
Examples from the Documentary:
The documentary emphasized how Brian manipulated Gabby into taking responsibility for their conflict, a classic sign of gaslighting and emotional abuse, which he used to avoid accountability.
The documentary detailed how, instead of showing remorse or seeking help, Brian drove Gabby’s van back to Florida, used her credit card, and acted as if nothing had happened, showing cold and calculated behavior rather than guilt or accountability.
It also highlighted how Brian’s family refused to cooperate with the investigation and how he fled to a nature reserve, further indicating avoidance of responsibility rather than remorse.
Examples from His Confession Letter:
Brian blamed Gabby’s death on an "accident," despite overwhelming evidence that it was intentional.
He positioned himself as the victim, making excuses rather than showing genuine remorse.
He wrote about "ending her suffering," a manipulative attempt to justify his actions.
Why This Is Abusive:
Abusers rarely take responsibility—instead, they blame the victim, circumstances, or external factors.
Brian’s confession showed a complete lack of accountability, proving he never saw Gabby as an equal partner but rather as someone he had control over.
Financial Strain and Escalating Violence: A Potential Hidden Trigger
Financial stress could have played a significant role in the dynamic between Gabby and Brian, potentially contributing to the abuse in their relationship. While the specifics of their financial situation are not fully known, there are several ways that financial stress can exacerbate tension and contribute to abusive behavior in relationships:
Increased Conflict Over Money
Money is one of the leading causes of stress in relationships, and when financial resources are strained, it can lead to heightened arguments and tension. For Gabby and Brian, their cross-country van trip, which was meant to be a shared adventure, also involved financial strain, including managing travel expenses, accommodation, and unexpected costs, as well as the need to rely on savings because Gabby’s van life travel blog was in the beginning stages and not yet generating income. This stress could have fueled emotional and verbal abuse as one partner may have blamed the other for financial shortcomings or become more controlling over money.
Control Through Financial Dependency
In abusive relationships, one partner may use financial control to maintain power over the other. Gabby was actively working on growing Nomadic Statik, aiming to turn it into a profitable social media brand, while there was little evidence that Brian had a stable source of income. After Gabby’s death, Brian illegally used her credit card to withdraw over $1,000, indicating he may have already been financially dependent on her and continued to do so even after her disappearance. Reports suggest that Gabby was more financially invested in their travels, covering expenses for gas, food, and the van’s upkeep, while Brian had less financial contribution. Despite Gabby being the one focused on making their van life a career, Brian was often the one controlling access to the van which was her financial lifeline, dictating their travels, and in some ways, controlling her ability to leave or be financially independent. This type of control reinforces the power dynamic, limiting the victim's ability to leave the relationship or make independent decisions.
The fact that the van was in Gabby’s name seems to indicate that Brian Laundrie was financially dependent on her, as it shows she was the primary person responsible for the vehicle, which was essential for their travels and livelihood. This detail suggests that while Brian had control over the van and their journey, the ownership and financial responsibility rested on Gabby. This dynamic may have further contributed to tensions in their relationship, as Brian's reliance on Gabby’s financial resources and ownership could have led to resentment or feelings of powerlessness, which may have manifested in controlling or abusive behaviors.
The texts from Gabby, where she stated that Brian told her she could have the van if she paid him, even though the van was in her name, strongly indicate financial dependence and control. This comment reveals a manipulative tactic by Brian, using the van—an essential part of their travel and business—as a tool of financial leverage. Despite the van being legally in Gabby’s name, Brian's demand for money shows his attempt to exert control over her, creating a financial barrier that could restrict her independence and increase her dependence on him.
Avoiding Accountability for Financial Mismanagement
If financial stress was linked to poor planning or irresponsible spending, Brian might have used emotional abuse or gaslighting to deflect responsibility and avoid blame. He could have shifted the blame to Gabby, making her feel as though the trip’s financial troubles were her fault, further undermining her confidence and creating a cycle of control and manipulation.
Isolation and Limited Support
When financial resources are limited, it can be harder for someone to access support systems, such as seeking help from friends, family, or professionals. Isolation becomes easier to enforce when the abuser controls where the victim goes, how they spend their money, and who they interact with. In Gabby and Brian’s case, the isolation from others during their long road trip may have made it even more difficult for Gabby to reach out for help or recognize the emotional and psychological abuse she was experiencing.
While financial stress was not the sole factor in the abusive behavior between Gabby and Brian, it could have contributed to an environment of control, manipulation, and escalating emotional abuse. Financial strain can amplify tensions and provide the abuser with additional tools to manipulate, isolate, and maintain dominance in the relationship.
What the Police Missed as Evidenced with the Body Cam Footage
One of the most critical moments in the case was the August 12, 2021, body cam footage from Moab, Utah, where police stopped Gabby and Brian, after a 911 caller reported seeing Brian hitting Gabby. Despite visible distress and evidence suggesting Gabby was a victim of intimate partner violence, the officers mishandled the situation, ultimately allowing Brian to walk free. Less than a month later, Gabby was found murdered in Wyoming. So, what did the police miss in that footage, and what could they have done differently?
Misidentifying Gabby as the Aggressor
One of the most critical mistakes the officers made was viewing Gabby as the primary aggressor, rather than a victim of abuse.
What the Officers Saw:
Gabby was visibly emotional, crying uncontrollably, and blaming herself.
She admitted to hitting Brian but only in response to a fight.
Brian had scratches on his face, which officers took as evidence that he was the victim.
What They Missed:
Gabby’s hysterical state was a classic sign of a trauma response. Victims of abuse often blame themselves to avoid further harm.
Brian appeared calm, collected, and charming, a known behavior in abusers when authorities are involved.
The 911 caller explicitly stated that Brian was seen hitting Gabby first, yet officers never treated him as the primary aggressor.
Gabby repeatedly expressed fear and anxiety, which are key indicators of a coercive, controlling relationship.
Officers minimized the marks on Gabby’s face and body during their encounter, as well as her statement that Brian had grabbed her face and jaw.
Why This Matters:
Many domestic violence victims fight back, but this does not make them the abuser.
The officers downplayed the severity of the situation and failed to recognize the signs of escalating abuse that were evident in both her physical appearance and emotional distress, as well as not recognizing the lethality indicated by Gabby’s statements that Brian grabbed her face. This act of aggression indicates high potential for past and future strangulation, which is how Gabby’s eventually died.
The officers failed to assess who had more power and control in the relationship, nor did they assess for primary abuse versus reactive abuse behaviors, crucial factors in domestic violence cases.
Ignoring Key Signs of Coercive Control
Domestic violence isn’t just physical—it often involves manipulation, gaslighting, and control. The body cam footage revealed several warning signs:
Brian’s Behavior:
Laughing and joking with officers, as if nothing serious had happened.
Minimizing the conflict, saying “she gets worked up sometimes.”
Throwing Gabby under the bus, making it seem like she was “crazy” or “unstable.”
Claiming he didn't want to push Gabby and was simply trying to keep her away, attempting to downplay his aggressive behavior and portray himself as a protective figure.
Gabby’s Behavior:
Apologizing excessively, even though she was the one in distress, saying things like, “I’m sorry, I’m the one who’s being emotional.”
Admitting that Brian locked her out of the van, a clear power move to control and intimidate her, which should have that Brian felt he had the power and authority to keep her away from her own van.
Being hyper-aware of Brian’s reactions, another sign of an abuse victim walking on eggshells.
Tried to downplay the severity of the argument, emphasizing how much she loved Brian, likely in an effort to regulate his anger and show that she wasn’t a threat to his sense of control.
Often positioned herself in a way that seemed to keep her distance from the officers but also remain close enough to Brian.
Focused more on her actions and downplaying Brian’s actions to avoid making him the focus of the police’s attention.
Why This Matters:
Abusers downplay their actions and shift blame to the victim.
Gabby’s clear fear and distress should have raised red flags.
Instead of separating them for a full domestic violence investigation, officers treated the situation as a simple lover’s quarrel.
Overlooking the 911 Call That Reported Brian Hitting Gabby
One of the most damning mistakes was that the initial 911 caller stated Brian was seen hitting Gabby—yet officers never fully acted on this information.
What Happened?
A witness called 911 saying, "The gentleman was slapping the girl."
This means that the police already had a report of Brian as the abuser before they even pulled them over.
However, they never asked Brian direct questions about this claim, and instead focused on the minor scratches he had and ignored the marks that Gabby had.
Why This Matters:
The police failed to investigate the 911 call properly, which could have shifted their entire approach.
If they had taken Brian’s physical aggression seriously, they may have been able to intervene before it was too late.
Failing to Follow Domestic Violence Protocols
Utah law requires police to determine the primary aggressor in domestic violence situations and make an arrest if there is evidence of assault. Instead, they chose to separate Gabby and Brian for the night—without pressing charges.
What They Did:
They decided that Gabby was the aggressor and suggested charging her with domestic violence.
Instead of arresting her, they separated them for the night and taking Brian to stay in a hotel.
What They Should Have Done:
Interviewed witnesses more thoroughly.
Examined the 911 call evidence before making conclusions.
Used domestic violence assessment tools to determine who was truly at risk.
Why This Matters:
Had the officers recognized Brian as the abuser, they could have arrested him or placed Gabby in a safe shelter.
Instead, Brian was free to continue controlling her, ultimately leading to her murder.
The decision not to arrest anyone despite the clear signs of conflict between Gabby and Brian led to them meeting up again that same night, even though they had been instructed to stay away from each other. This decision likely allowed the escalation of tension between them to continue unchecked, possibly contributing to further abuse and ultimately Gabby's tragic death.
What Needs to Change?
The failure of law enforcement in Gabby Petito’s case highlights a larger issue—police officers are often not properly trained to recognize domestic abuse dynamics.
Better Training in Coercive Control & Trauma Responses – Officers need to understand that victims may cry, take the blame, or appear unstable, but this does not mean they are the aggressor.
Mandatory Use of Domestic Violence Risk Assessments – These tools help determine who holds the power in a relationship and who is at higher risk.
Taking Witness Statements Seriously – A 911 call reporting physical abuse should be treated as direct evidence, not dismissed.
Stronger Intervention Policies – Simply separating couples is not enough when clear signs of abuse are present.
Parental Influence: How Brian Laundrie's Family Enabled His Abusive Behavior
Brian’s mother, Roberta Laundrie, wrote a letter to him that surfaced during the investigation, and its contents raised serious concerns about her influence on his mindset. The letter, which included disturbing phrases like offering to help him "bury a body" and references to doing "anything" for him, including ways she would help him to break out of jail, suggested an extreme level of enabling and protection, regardless of his actions. While she later claimed it was metaphorical or taken out of context, even though it is believed to have been written after Gabby's death based on the context of the investigation and its contents, the tone of the letter reflected an unhealthy dynamic where she reinforced the idea that he could rely on her to escape consequences, no matter what he had done.
This type of messaging—whether explicit or implicit—can contribute to a person developing a sense of entitlement, lack of accountability, and a belief that they can act without repercussions. If Brian was raised with the understanding that his parents would cover for him, lie for him, or shield him from responsibility, it could have reinforced his abusive tendencies. It may have also played a role in how he responded when things spiraled out of control with Gabby—rather than accepting responsibility, he fled and relied on his parents' silence and protection.
His parents' reported silence, delay in cooperating with law enforcement, conversations with him right after Gabby’s murder, their contacting an attorney after this phone conversation with him, and possible assistance in helping him evade authorities suggest a pattern of shielding him from accountability. If they had a history of protecting him from consequences in the past, this could have reinforced a mindset where he believed he could control situations without facing repercussions.
His family’s actions strongly suggest an enmeshed relationship between Brian and his mother. This kind of emotional dependency, where the parent and child’s boundaries are blurred, is common in enmeshed relationships and can contribute to unhealthy dynamics. In such relationships, the child may never learn to take full responsibility for their actions, as the parent consistently shields them from consequences. This behavior is especially prevalent among abusers, where parents, out of misplaced loyalty or denial, may defend or excuse harmful behavior, thus enabling the abuser to continue their actions without facing accountability. The Laundrie family's response to Brian’s alleged crimes points to a lack of healthy boundaries, which is often seen in cases of abuse, where the abuser’s needs are prioritized, leading to the perpetuation of harmful behaviors without intervention.
While Brian alone was responsible for his abuse and actions, their actions illustrate how deeply ingrained family dynamics and parental influence can contribute to someone developing a mindset where manipulation, avoidance, and control become their default responses. Parental influence—whether through modeling unhealthy relationships, failing to teach emotional regulation, enabling problematic behaviors, or protecting a child from consequences—can contribute to how someone develops patterns of control and manipulation.
Brian Laundrie was solely responsible for his own abusive behavior. Abuse is a choice, and he made repeated decisions to manipulate, control, and harm Gabby. While external factors such as upbringing, mental health, or societal influences can contribute to a person's attitudes and behaviors, they do not excuse or justify abuse. Many people experience hardships without resorting to harming others. Ultimately, Brian’s actions—his emotional manipulation, gaslighting, coercive control, and escalation to physical violence—were deliberate and calculated. He had the capacity to choose different responses, to seek help if needed, or to walk away from the relationship rather than exert power over Gabby. Responsibility lies with the abuser, not with the victim or any outside influences.
How Gabby Petito's Story Resonated with Domestic Violence Survivors
The Gabby Petito case emotionally affected many domestic violence (DV) survivors in a variety of ways, triggering a mix of personal reflections, heightened fears, and feelings of solidarity, while also sparking hope for greater awareness and support. Here's how it emotionally impacted DV survivors:
Validation and Reflection
For many DV survivors, watching the Gabby Petito case unfold brought a sense of validation. Survivors who had experienced emotional abuse, coercive control, or even physical violence saw their own stories reflected in Gabby’s struggles. The public visibility of her distress, especially in the bodycam footage where she expresses fear and confusion about her relationship, mirrored the emotional turmoil that many survivors face in abusive situations. Survivors often recognize the same patterns of gaslighting and manipulation in their own relationships, feeling emotionally seen and acknowledged.
Increased Public Awareness of Domestic Violence
The intense media coverage of Gabby Petito's disappearance and murder helped bring the issue of domestic violence to the forefront of national conversations. DV survivors saw a public discussion about coercive control, emotional abuse, and gaslighting, which are often not recognized or understood as forms of abuse. The case highlighted the disproportionate levels of violence that many victims, especially women, face in their relationships, making it easier for survivors to see their experiences reflected in a high-profile case.
Triggering Recollections of Trauma
The case also triggered painful memories for some survivors, especially those who had been in abusive relationships or had similar experiences with controlling partners. The media coverage of Gabby’s death and the details of her relationship with Brian may have brought back deeply painful emotions, such as anxiety, helplessness, and even post-traumatic stress. The familiarity of the behaviors exhibited by Brian, like controlling actions, isolation, and emotional manipulation, could have evoked intense emotional responses in survivors who experienced similar abuse.
Retraumatization
Gabby’s case, coupled with the police mishandling of the situation, could significantly influence retraumatization for DV survivors. When law enforcement fails to recognize or act upon clear signs of abuse, as seen in how the officers responded to Gabby and Brian’s interaction, it sends a harmful message that survivors may not be believed or supported when they seek help. This mishandling can mirror past trauma for victims who have experienced similar dismissive or inadequate responses, further undermining their sense of safety and trust in the justice system. For survivors, witnessing the lack of intervention can trigger feelings of helplessness, shame, and frustration, deepening their psychological wounds and making them feel as though their experiences are not worthy of protection or justice and intensifying their urge to avoid reporting their abuse. Additionally, Gabby’s case, widely publicized, could serve as a reminder of systemic failures and the ongoing risks of abuse, reinforcing the fear and isolation many survivors already face.
Increased Anxiety and Fear
For some survivors, the case amplified anxiety and fear, particularly as the focus on Gabby’s tragic end highlighted how abuse can quickly escalate to life-threatening situations. The reality that abuse often turns deadly when a victim tries to leave—a phenomenon many survivors are painfully aware of—was underscored by Gabby’s case. This heightened awareness may have made survivors more cautious or fearful about their own situations, especially those who had left or were contemplating leaving their abusers.
Empowerment and Solidarity
On the other hand, for many survivors, the case also offered a sense of empowerment. Seeing Gabby’s story gain widespread attention was an opportunity for them to reflect on the importance of their own voices. Survivors may have felt encouraged to speak up about their own experiences, knowing that public awareness was growing around domestic violence. The case created a shared moment of solidarity among DV survivors, reinforcing the idea that they are not alone and that there is an ongoing movement for justice and awareness.
Reinforcing the Importance of Listening to Survivors' Stories
Survivors often feel dismissed or ignored when they attempt to speak out about their experiences, whether due to societal stigma or victim-blaming attitudes. Gabby’s case shone a light on how victims' concerns and experiences deserve attention, even when there isn’t clear physical evidence of violence. Gabby’s bodycam footage and her own expressions of distress during her interactions with law enforcement helped to amplify the need for police and others to take emotional abuse and manipulation seriously. This focus on the emotional toll of abuse encouraged survivors to share their own stories, knowing they weren't alone in facing the psychological and emotional manipulation that can be part of an abusive relationship.
Empowering Survivors to Seek Help
Many DV survivors saw the Gabby Petito case as a wake-up call. It emphasized that abuse isn’t always visible and that relationships that may seem “perfect” on the surface could be hiding deep psychological trauma. The case prompted increased attention to the need for better support systems for victims of domestic violence, encouraging survivors to seek help or leave dangerous situations. It reminded them that getting out of an abusive relationship is critical—as the worst-case scenario can often be fatal.
Grief and Frustration
While Gabby’s case drew significant attention, it also stirred frustration and grief for many survivors, particularly those from marginalized groups, who felt that they, or the loved ones of other victims of color, would never get the same level of media coverage. This created a sense of emotional disparity, as many survivors felt the pain of missing persons and abuse cases that didn’t receive the same spotlight. It also triggered feelings of grief for those who never got the same chance for justice or visibility, especially when the system failed them or ignored their cries for help.
Highlighting the Issue of Missing People and Underreporting
The overwhelming media coverage of Gabby’s disappearance contrasted sharply with the relative lack of attention given to cases involving missing people of color or marginalized groups. This disparity sparked conversations about the racial and ethnic biases in how missing persons and domestic violence cases are treated. Many survivors, especially those from underrepresented communities, found validation in knowing that this issue was now on the public agenda and hoped it would lead to greater awareness of all missing and abused individuals, regardless of race or background.
Shining a Light on the Escalation of Abuse
The case illustrated how abuse can escalate to deadly levels—something many DV survivors are acutely aware of. The media’s attention to the timeline leading up to Gabby’s death emphasized how leaving an abusive partner can often be the most dangerous time, which is a reality faced by many survivors.
Impact on Legal and Law Enforcement Approaches
The case also brought attention to the ways law enforcement interacts with survivors, especially when it comes to recognizing and responding to signs of emotional and psychological abuse. Gabby’s interactions with police in Moab raised questions about how law enforcement handles domestic violence calls and whether officers truly understand the complexity of abusive relationships. The case encouraged DV survivors to push for more training for law enforcement to handle situations involving emotional abuse and coercion properly, as well as how they could advocate for policies that protect victims before violence escalates.
Hope for Change and Increased Support
Finally, the Gabby Petito case gave many survivors hope that increased public attention would lead to more resources, better policies, and increased law enforcement training when it comes to handling DV cases. Survivors, especially those who have struggled to gain support or navigate systems that often don’t take emotional or psychological abuse seriously, hoped that the case would result in broader societal changes and more effective protection for victims of domestic violence. For some, it created a spark of optimism that there could be real, positive change for future victims.
The Tragic Reality of Ignored Red Flags
Brian Laundrie’s behavior throughout his relationship with Gabby Petito showed clear signs of an abusive partner, yet many of these warning signs were missed or dismissed—by police, bystanders, and possibly even Gabby herself.
Her heartbreaking death serves as a critical reminder: Emotional abuse is real abuse. Abusers often appear “normal” to the outside world. Early intervention can save lives.
If someone shows signs of controlling, gaslighting, or isolating their partner, take it seriously. Domestic violence doesn’t always start with physical harm—but it often escalates to it.
Could Gabby’s Death Have Been Prevented?
While no one can say for certain, had the police properly identified Brian as the abuser, they could have taken action to protect Gabby from further harm. Instead, they missed critical red flags, allowing the cycle of abuse to continue until it was too late.
Her story is a tragic reminder of why we need stronger domestic violence awareness, better law enforcement training, and immediate intervention when warning signs appear, as well as a greater understanding of the elements of abuse and the escalation of violence in abusive relationships.
You shouldn’t have to fear the ones you love.
If you or someone you know is in an abusive relationship, help is available. Reach out to a trusted friend, family member, or professional resource. You deserve safety, love, and respect.
Resources for Support:
· National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) or text “START” to 88788
· Love Is Respect: www.loveisrespect.org
· The Hotline: www.thehotline.org
Take a deeper dive—tap here!